awacke1 commited on
Commit
672bc36
·
1 Parent(s): c0f068b

Update app.py

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. app.py +3 -4
app.py CHANGED
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ pipelines = {model: QANomEndToEndPipeline(model) for model in models}
10
 
11
  description = f"""This is a demo of the full QANom Pipeline - identifying deverbal nominalizations and parsing them with question-answer driven semantic role labeling (QASRL) """
12
  title="QANom End-to-End Pipeline Demo"
13
- examples = [[models[1], "Physics is low and everything else was a recommendation. I've met a lot of people that can break the law,
14
  but I have never met anyone who could break physics.
15
  ", 0.7],
16
- [models[1], "It's really just saying, let's boil something down
17
  to the most fundamental principles, the things that we are most confident are true
18
  at a foundational level, and that sets your axiomatic base, and then you reason up from there.
19
  And then you cross check your conclusion against the axiomatic truth.
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ anything really.", 0.75],
24
  [models[1], "or technology, whatever it might be, and say, "What is this? What is the perfect arrangement of atoms
25
  that would be the best possible product? And now let us try to figure out how to get the atoms in that shape."
26
  - I mean, it sounds, it's almost like Rick and Morty absurd
27
- until you start to really think about it. And you really should think about it in this way
28
- 'cause everything else is kind of, if you think you might fall victim to the momentum
29
  of the way things are done in the past, unless you think in this way. - Well, just as a function of inertia, people will want to use the same tools and methods", 0.5]]
30
 
31
 
 
10
 
11
  description = f"""This is a demo of the full QANom Pipeline - identifying deverbal nominalizations and parsing them with question-answer driven semantic role labeling (QASRL) """
12
  title="QANom End-to-End Pipeline Demo"
13
+ examples = [[models[1], "Physics is low and everything else was a recommendation. Ive met a lot of people that can break the law,
14
  but I have never met anyone who could break physics.
15
  ", 0.7],
16
+ [models[1], "Its really just saying, lets boil something down
17
  to the most fundamental principles, the things that we are most confident are true
18
  at a foundational level, and that sets your axiomatic base, and then you reason up from there.
19
  And then you cross check your conclusion against the axiomatic truth.
 
24
  [models[1], "or technology, whatever it might be, and say, "What is this? What is the perfect arrangement of atoms
25
  that would be the best possible product? And now let us try to figure out how to get the atoms in that shape."
26
  - I mean, it sounds, it's almost like Rick and Morty absurd
27
+ until you start to really think about it. And you really should think about it in this way cause everything else is kind of, if you think you might fall victim to the momentum
 
28
  of the way things are done in the past, unless you think in this way. - Well, just as a function of inertia, people will want to use the same tools and methods", 0.5]]
29
 
30