CrowdSelect: Synthetic Instruction Data Selection with Multi-LLM Wisdom
Abstract
Distilling advanced Large Language Models' instruction-following capabilities into smaller models using a selected subset has become a mainstream approach in model training. While existing synthetic instruction data selection strategies rely mainly on single-dimensional signals (i.e., reward scores, model perplexity), they fail to capture the complexity of instruction-following across diverse fields. Therefore, we investigate more diverse signals to capture comprehensive instruction-response pair characteristics and propose three foundational metrics that leverage Multi-LLM wisdom, informed by (1) diverse LLM responses and (2) reward model assessment. Building upon base metrics, we propose CrowdSelect, an integrated metric incorporating a clustering-based approach to maintain response diversity. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our foundation metrics consistently improve performance across 4 base models on MT-bench and Arena-Hard. CrowdSelect, efficiently incorporating all metrics, achieves state-of-the-art performance in both Full and LoRA fine-tuning, showing improvements of 4.81% on Arena-Hard and 11.1% on MT-bench with Llama-3.2-3b-instruct. We hope our findings will bring valuable insights for future research in this direction. Code are available at https://github.com/listentm/crowdselect.
Community
This paper presents a novel method leveraging collective wisdom from multiple LLMs for synthetic instruction data selection, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art approaches in efficient small LLM distillation. Code are available at https://github.com/listentm/crowdselect.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That Fit (2025)
- R.I.P.: Better Models by Survival of the Fittest Prompts (2025)
- From Drafts to Answers: Unlocking LLM Potential via Aggregation Fine-Tuning (2025)
- WildLong: Synthesizing Realistic Long-Context Instruction Data at Scale (2025)
- PAFT: Prompt-Agnostic Fine-Tuning (2025)
- Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training (2025)
- IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier (2025)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment:
@librarian-bot
recommend
Nice work on this! Just wondering about a technical concern - did you consider whether selecting the best answer from such a diverse sample of models (which were themselves selected based on benchmark performance) might introduce some statistical bias?
Meta and Alibaba probably tested thousands of LLaMa and Qwen variants before selecting the ones that performed best on benchmarks. Since your super-SimPO approach further selects from these already-filtered models, there's a possibility that what you're measuring is correlation with benchmark patterns rather than absolute capability improvements.
Have you run any tests to differentiate between actual reasoning improvements versus increased alignment with the specific patterns that benchmarks are designed to reward? This could be an interesting dimension to explore in your analysis. In any case, really nice!
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper